Heuristic Evaluation of UI/UX to Enhance Experience and Sales in E-commerce

Authors

    Rendi Andika( 1 ) Dram Renaldi( 2 )

    (1) Buddhi Dharma University
    (2) Buddhi Dharma University

DOI:


https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v7i2.1730

Keywords:


E-commerce, User Experience , User Interface , Heuristic Evaluation , Website Usability Testing

Abstract

User experience and interface (UI/UX) are critical elements in e-commerce websites, where an unattractive design and lack of user engagement can negatively impact potential sales. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the UI/UX on a company's e-commerce website, which has received complaints from users regarding the interface design and low purchase interest. The evaluation was conducted using the Heuristic Evaluation method, applying Nielsen's 10 principles with three evaluators to identify interface issues affecting user experience. The results of the study revealed significant weaknesses in three main principles: "Visibility of System Status," "Match Between System and the Real World," and "Help and Documentation." Each of these principles received a score of category 2 on the Likert Scale, indicating substantial usability weaknesses in the UI. Solutions implemented included improving icon visibility, providing clearer system feedback, using more understandable language, and adding comprehensive online guidance. After these improvements, a re-evaluation showed score increases: "Visibility of System Status" improved from 38.4% to 49.6%, "Match Between System and the Real World" from 38.4% to 51.2%, and "Help and Documentation" from 37.6% to 48.8%. These findings indicate that UI/UX improvements based on Heuristic Evaluation can enhance the overall user experience, which is expected to help the company attract potential buyers and increase sales potential through the e-commerce website.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

APJII, “Survei APJII Pengguna Internet di Indonesia Tembus 215 Juta Orang.” [Online]. Available: https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/survei-apjii-pengguna-internet-di-indonesia-tembus-215-juta-orang

S. Jenderal and K. Perdagangan, “PERDAGANGAN DIGITAL (E-COMMERCE) INDONESIA PERIODE 2023 Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi,” 2024.

Global Web Index, “Product Reviews and Commerce,” 2018. [Online]. Available: www.globalwebindex.com

U. Ependi, “HEURISTIC EVALUATION FOR MOBILE APPLICATION (STUDI KASUS: APLIKASI DEPO AUTO 2000 TANJUNG API API PALEMBANG),” Jurnal SIMETRIS, vol. 8, 2019.

R. A. Fauzi, L. R. Anuggilarso, A. R. Hardika, and D. I. S. Saputra, “Penggunaan Konsep Flat Design pada Markers Semaphore Augmented Reality,” InfoTekJar (Jurnal Nasional Informatika dan Teknologi Jaringan), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 42–46, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.30743/infotekjar.v4i1.1375.

T. Granollers, “Usability Evaluation with Heuristics. New Proposal from Integrating Two Trusted Sources,” A. Marcus, Ed., Lleida: Springer, Jun. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325490332_Usability_Evaluation_with_Heuristics_New_Proposal_from_Integrating_Two_Trusted_Sources

A. N. Muna, “EVALUASI USER INTERFACE PADA APLIKASI E-COMMERCE BUKALAPAK (4.81.2) MENGGUNAKAN METODE HEURISTIC EVALUATION,” 2021.

Radek, “Mengapa cukup menguji 5 pengguna?,” thestory.is. [Online]. Available: https://thestory.is/en/journal/why-is-it-enough-to-test-5-users/

H. Nadhirah, N. H. Wardani, and K. C. Brata, “Evaluasi Usability dan Perbaikan Desain Website Dinas Pendidikan Kota Malang menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation dengan Prinsip Usability G-Quality,” vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 6115–6124, Jun. 2019, [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id

N. R. Wiwesa, “USER INTERFACE DAN USER EXPERIENCE UNTUK MENGELOLA KEPUASAN PELANGGAN,” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Terapan, vol. 3, no. 2, 2021.

M. I. Farouqi, I. Aknuranda, and A. D. Herlambang, “Evaluasi Usability pada Aplikasi Go-Jek Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pengujian Usability,” vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 3110–3117, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id

Y. Sriyeni, “Analisis Usability Aplikasi Investasi Digital Menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation dan System Usability Scale,” 2022, doi: 10.36982/jiig.v13i2.2294.

F. K. Umam, F. Ramdani, and S. H. Wijoyo, “Analisis Perbandingan Tiga Metode Evaluasi Usability Dalam Mencari Permasalahan Usability (Studi Kasus: Aplikasi Situbondo Tera’),” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 514–522, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id

M. A. Kosim, S. R. Aji, and M. Darwis, “PENGUJIAN USABILITY APLIKASI PEDULILINDUNGI DENGAN METODE SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE (SUS) 1),” Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Sains Teknologi, vol. 4, no. 2, 2022.

G. Tambunan and L. Malem Ginting, “COMPARISON OF HEURISTIC EVALUATION AND COGNITIVE WALKTHROUGH METHODS IN DOING USABILITY EVALUATION OF MOBILE-BASED DEL EGOV CENTRE HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM,” SEMINASTIKA, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 99–106, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.47002/seminastika.v3i1.244.

R. Nurhabibie, I. V Paputungan, and B. Suranto, “Pengembangan User Experience pada website AyoSparring menggunakan Pendekatan User-Centered Design dan Metode Heuristic Evaluation,” 2020.

U. Ependi, T. B. Kurniawan, and F. Panjaitan, “SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE VS HEURISTIC EVALUATION: A REVIEW,” Jurnal SIMETRIS, vol. 10, no. 1, 2019.

B. Rudianto, “Implementasi Heuristic Evaluation Dan System Usability Scale Dalam Analisis Usability Aplikasi Precise,” Jurnal Sains dan Manajemen, vol. 12, no. 2, 2024.

N. Fanzury, “Pengukuran Usability Aplikasi Web Menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation,” Pasinformatik, vol. 2, Jan. 2023.

T. Meirizky Girdayanto, J. Fernandes Andry, I. Ivana Limawal, F. Debby, and U. Bunda Mulia Jubiko, “ANALISIS USER INTERFACE PADA WEBSITE BUKALAPAK DENGAN METODE HEURISTIC Program Studi Desain Komunikasi Visual, Fakultas Desain dan Teknologi Universitas Bunda Mulia,” 2022, doi: 10.2241/narada.2022.v9.i1.003.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

[1]
R. Andika and D. Renaldi, “Heuristic Evaluation of UI/UX to Enhance Experience and Sales in E-commerce”, bit-Tech, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 224–251, Dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles
DOI : https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v7i2.1730
Abstract views: 19 / PDF downloads: 12