Simple Additive Weighting: Determination of The Local Government Officials Tanggamus Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v6i3.1559
Keywords:
Decision Support System, Government Officials, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, Simple Additive Weighting
Abstract
This study aims to determine regional officials in the Tanggamus region using a decision support system based on the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. In the government official environment, determining regional officials is crucial as they are government employees who hold important positions at both regional and provincial levels. The issue of determining regional officials in the Tanggamus area is significant due to various problems such as the behavior of officials, absenteeism, lack of socialization in society, and more. This study employs the SAW method, which involves variables like educational level, behavior of officials, and rank. This system is designed to aid in decision-making for selecting responsible regional officials who are accountable for their duties. The findings indicate that the SAW method is effective in evaluating alternatives based on predefined criteria. Officials appointed in an area must possess honesty in performing their duties and comply with established regulations. This system allows for a more transparent and accurate process in determining regional officials. The results of this study are expected to provide a decision support information system for regional officials in the Tanggamus region, ensuring that selected officials have the necessary qualifications and integrity to fulfill their roles.
Downloads
References
M. Alemi-Ardakani, A. S. Milani, S. Yannacopoulos, and G. Shokouhi, “On the effect of subjective, objective and combinative weighting in multiple criteria decision making: A case study on impact optimization of composites,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 46, pp. 426–438, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.003.
A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, and E. K. Zavadskas, “Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 4126–4148, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003.
E. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, “Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods in Economics: An Overview,” Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., vol. 17, pp. 397–427, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.3846/20294913.2011.593291.
S. Opricovic and G.-H. Tzeng, “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
I. K. Podkopaev, “Simple Additive Weighting – a metamodel for Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis methods,” 2016.
M. Karismariyanti, “Scholarship recipient decision support simulation using the composite performance index method.,” Comput. Account. study Progr. Telkom Polytech. Bandung.
A. A. Khoirudin, “SNATI Decision Support System for Determining the Eligibility of International Standard School Pilot Candidates Using the Fuzzy Associative Memory Method,” Dep. Informatics Eng. Fac. Ind. Technol. Islam. Univ. Indones., 2008.
H. Wibowo, R. Amalia, M. A. Fadlun, and K. Arivanty, “Department of Information Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Islamic University of Indonesia National Seminar on Information Technology Applications 2009”.
A. Hermawan and E. -, “Hotel Recommendation System Using SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) And TOPSIS (The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) Method,” bit-Tech, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 129–143, 2019, doi: 10.32877/bt.v1i3.71.
S. Kusumadewi, “Artificial Intelligence Lecture Diktat,” Dep. Informatics Eng ineering, Fac. Ind. Technol. Islam. Univ. Indones., 2007.
D. Chrismianto, “Department of Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology – Petra Christian University,” Fac. Eng. Dep. Mar. Eng. Diponegoro Univ. Semarang.
Atika Linda, Lecturer at Bina Darma University, Decision Support System for Performance Assessment for Selection of Outstanding Lecturers Using the AHP Method
Hamzah, Suyoto, Mudjihartono Paulus Master of Informatics Engineering, Atmajaya University Yogyakarta National Seminar on Informatics 2010 (semnasIF 2010) UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta, 22 May 2010
Turban, E., Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems , Prentice-Hall Inc., A Simon & Schuster Company Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 1998.
Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods in Economics: An Overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), 397-427.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 bit-Tech
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
I hereby assign and transfer to bit-Tech all exclusive copyright ownership rights to the above work. This includes, but is not limited to, the right to publish, republish, downgrade, distribute, transmit, sell, or use the work and other related materials worldwide, in whole, or in part, in all languages, in electronic, printed, or any other form of media, now known or hereafter developed and reserves the right to permit or license a third party to do any of the above. I understand that this exclusive right will belong to bit-Tech from the date the article is accepted for publication. I also understand that bit-Tech, as the copyright owner, has sole authority to license and permit reproduction of the article. I understand that, except for copyright, any other proprietary rights associated with the work (e.g. patents or other rights to any process or procedure) must be retained by the author. In addition, I understand that bit-Tech permits authors to use their papers in any way permitted by the applied Creative Commons license.
DOI :
Abstract views: 45
/ 
PDF downloads: 30
